Beginning of the end?
Clubs offer so-called "free" instruction.
Remember, you get what you pay for.
Club volunteer instructors, who basically have the last word on growth, have no obligation to provide anything.
AMA Financial Report
Don't look good
5. Chief Financial Officer’s Report (Keith Sessions)
• Keith Sessions wants EC to consider 1-, 2-, and 3-year timelines. Start considering this well in advance. If there is economic slowdown, and he expects this to occur in 2020, it will be easier to reduce in advance rather than reacting to the situation as it occurs. Expenses must be considered and reduced as they can be. We are currently 9 years into a bull market, and he cautioned not to expect that to continue. Expenses are up. Staff has been cutting where it can and being efficient, so funds can be reallocated where needed. District budgets will possibly be lower next year. He is currently identifying larger budgets that can be reevaluated. He asked at what point do you determine that traditions no longer have the importance they once did (ex.: trade shows, competitions) and suggested considering strategic changes in allocation of available funding.
• He reminded everyone that this is a discretionary hobby. He expects that membership numbers will be a challenge. Modelers are aging out. He mentioned that AMA strives hard to be relevant to the younger crowd.
• Earnings are currently strong. New tax laws have helped the market and AMA’s earnings. The market is still strong, but he expects that this will begin to fall. Investment yield curve is concerning and expressed the need to be conservative with spending
• Impending tariffs will have an impact on our hobby. Items impacted will include LiPo batteries, radios, and servos.
• Staff is committed to a balanced budget. He has concerns with lobbying expenses and stressed the need to maintain a proper balance.
• Jay Marsh (D-IV) questioned how to get a committee budget. Currently there are no committee budgets. He would like to recognize committee members with caps, hats, badges, and some sort of recognition. Keith reminded that if money is allotted for committees, it has to come from somewhere. Rich suggested considering a line item in the budget for contingencies. AMA is in the business of serving members first, but cautioned that AMA needs to make expenditures cost effective.
• Bob Reynolds (Brady Ware) discussed the audit report. He thanked and complimented all participants in the audit process. AMA had a robust year in market earnings, but warned that what goes up, must come down. He reiterated much of what Keith Sessions had presented. He expects deferred revenue (membership income) to begin to level out.
• Bob presented a handout of 10-year operating analysis. It shows that AMA is reliant on investment holdings for solvency and illustrates that expenditures needs to be carefully considered. He stated that the current growth is a result of market performance and investment.
• Bob also noted that membership revenue was up slightly because of the dues increase and previously offered discount. There was an increase in Youth members, and suggested exploring a strategy to entice these members to become members for life.
• Bob noted that the advertising revenue for Model Aviation has decreased substantially. Although direct operating costs did decrease some, it wasn’t enough to offset the ad revenue loss. The expenditures for AMA West exceeded the income in 2017, although not in 2016. He also noted that insurance claims did not increase.
• Bob noted that AMA’s income and operating expenses do not balance. AMA is reliant on investment holdings that are up because of the market increase, illustrating the market’s volatility.
• Rich asked if it might be strategic to further diversify the revenue (develop other forms of revenue than member dues alone).
• Bob feels there needs to be a balance of between member benefits and operating costs. AMA must raise the revenue in order to balance the operating costs. He encouraged the EC to consider asking if there are additional revenue diversification opportunities. What are people paying (somebody besides AMA) to participate in the hobby in addition to membership dues (ex: a model kit)? Is there a revenue opportunity/entrepreneurial opportunity there?
• Bob mentioned that the 2018 statements/balance sheets will be presented differently. Organizations will also now need to disclose their financial liquidity.
• Rich asked for confirmation that AMA’s portfolio managers were looking at strategies to minimize the potential impact of a serious marked downturn or recession.
Motion to approve the 2017 audit report. Motion passed by acclamation
You got it instruction?
Why hobby shops are closing
"One of our biggest events for about 5 years running was having two booths in the Old Humble Oil Days. That was a downtown Humble, TX show of all kinds of stuff, booths lined back to back for 6 or more blocks down Main Street. Lots of folks coming by. We had all the things, models of all sizes, simulators, actual LARGE Trainer with Transmitter. and Buddy Cord for demonstrating how actual training worked. Lots of old magazines, with Club info inserted in, Club/Event Flyers for when, where,, contacts and about everything one could imagine for showing our fine facility on Club-Owned 50 acres with 5000 ft. shelter, and indoor rest facilities.
Each year, the CLUB AND A LHS DONATED AWARDS including a low cost electric trainer for a raffle at the show.
DID WE EVER GET A NEW MEMBER OUT OF THAT? NOT ONE! Therefore we shut the program down as the club could no longer invest the 3-500 Yankee dollars each year it cost us to show there with ZERO return on investment.
We have advertised and performed the AMA TAG program a number of times. In Sep. '09, we had a huge IMAC event. Sunday afternoon we ran a TAG program. Over 40 - I forget actual number - spectators received both simulator time and actual hands-on training by Club Intro. Pilots. Any new members? Not that I know of."
I am not sure that the average member of the AMA today is concerned about the growth of the hobby. In fact, I am reasonably sure he or she doesn't care. As an organization, the AMA and the industry have a common interest in seeing the activity grow. In this sense, the AMA and the industry have more in common than the AMA and the large portion of its own membership. The typical AMA member is rightfully interested in what AMA is doing for him, not what AMA is doing for aero modeling.
Dave Brown 1994
Ad in March 2017 Model
Aviation magazine Page: 145
Promotional RC flight instruction
Hobby shop owners, Industry
members. General public, School
teachers. Email: email@example.com
LEADER TO LEADER
Membership Drive Reaction
by Jim Rice, Chairman Leader Member Committee
As I write this, it is a week before Christmas and the final membership numbers for 2009 are fresh in my mind ... Depressing but still in my mind. We had a membership drive. A well-thought-out, but poorly executed drive. The leg work was done at the HQ level and the advertising was done in Model Aviation and by word of mouth via most of the District VPs. Yet the grass roots level, where the newbie meets the member, it didn’t happen very well; seemingly no interest in the growth of the membership by the average modeler or club.
That should give all of us with a little concern about the future of our organization cause to reflect on why we aren’t growing or worse yet, why we are shrinking. Everyone who has been a member more than five years (and that is who this article is targeted toward) remembers when getting a new member started flying rejuvenated your own enthusiasm, which was then expressed and passed on to the newbie, resulting in his or her rapid infusion into this addictive sport. The newbie then brings friends and relatives to the field to try to get them addicted as well. It could snowball, it should snowball from there, but lately it hasn’t done that very well! We keep harping on bringing in more new members but don’t concentrate so hard on keeping the ones we already have. If your club brings in six new members this year but loses ten old ones we have a net loss. If every club in the AMA lost just three members, we would be down about 7,000 members before we ever started to recruit the new members! So why are we losing them as fast, if not faster, than we can recruit them? You may know better than I do but I have some ideas from personal experience and daily contact with clubs and members that are having problems with each other. Following is a list of issues I have seen:
1. Club dues are too high when coupled with initiation fees and AMA dues and perhaps holiday spending if the club has renewal at the first of the year.
2. Club meetings are stagnant, discussing the same old business with no flair of creativity to try to encourage the membership to be there for the fellowship, the modeling exchange, and the educational experience.
3. Cliquish groups that make it hard for a newcomer to become a part of the organization—If you can’t afford an XYZ don’t sit with us; If you can’t do a double whifferdill with a twist you don’t need to fly with us; If you didn’t use escapements and reeds you won’t be able to communicate with us, etc.
4. Old-time members with a chip on their shoulders about new folks, new styles, and new ideas. Some old guys (I qualify for that) don’t want to have their club changed and are not willing to tolerate anyone who may have a good new idea. The board of directors ought to change fairly regularly and bring in new ideas and new blood. I have had reports of members being threatened by old timers who don’t want change, even to the point that the police have had to be involved.
5. Conduct at the field that is unacceptable for mixed company or families. I have seen and had reported to me too many incidents of vulgar and foul language being used so loudly that it made many at the field uncomfortable. Guys don’t want to bring their spouses or children out to the field and subject them to that. For that matter, many longtime modelers would rather not be subjected to that either.
6. Safety officers or instructor pilots treating the membership or new pilot like a stupid third grader (this assumes the recipient of the barrage is not a stupid third grader). I had a couple of guys who were longtime modelers tell me they joined a club based on my recommendation and began flying on the first day at the field with no orientation or advice. The Safety Officer observed they were not following one of the club’s local rules and berated them loudly and publicly instead of quietly explaining the rules to the newbies. They both quit the club after one day of flying. Fortunately for AMA they found another club instead of dropping the hobby.
7. Sometimes spectators come to observe the activity and are not welcomed and given a tour/briefing about the club and the hobby. Heck if you have a closed membership that doesn’t mean you can’t get someone addicted and send them elsewhere to fly. Take a minute and brag about your club and your hobby, you might get us a new modeler and get yourself a new friend.
8. Competition events aren’t designed to allow a new pilot to compete with limited skills, therefore they don’t compete because they don’t want to be beat up and embarrassed by the experienced club aces. Design some events that don’t even require a takeoff or landing so that a guy on a buddy box can compete. For example, a two-minute timed flight from the time the instructor hands the airplane over until the student calls time or the instructor has to take it back. Or climb and glide if the student can take off okay but has trouble landing. The time stops when the student adds power to abort the landing.
9. Maybe a worse thing in today’s electronic world is the argumentative nature of many of the forums that a new or prospective member might visit. Just observing some of the threads would be enough to cause some potential new members to look elsewhere and if they post a question and get beaten up for their ignorance, they aren’t going to want to come back for more.
10. Sometimes a club may need to embrace new technology or styles to try to help the newer modelers. I saw a sign on a non-AMA club gate one time that said No Park Flyers or Electrics Allowed. I went on in and asked if I could fly. I had a park flyer-sized electric that I designed that flew exceptionally well. I talked with the guys present and they agreed to let me fly; evidently the guy who objected to my kind of airplane was not there that day. After my first flight they gathered around the airplane and wanted to know more about it and its propulsion system. I doubt my visit converted the field but I think it impacted the thoughts of the ones who were present that day. If your club doesn’t have a way to allow helicopters, see if you can do it. If you don’t have a way to do hi-starts and winches for gliders, see if you can accommodate them. Do you have a place to make a CL circle, even a temporary one until the guys who want to fly CL can help you make a permanent one?
11. Does your club newsletter grab the attention of the average club member? Do he see his name or picture or his friend’s in print? Does the newsletter make him want to get out to the field or over to the club meeting? A newsletter editor’s job may be the toughest on the board. Help write an article, provide a picture, tell a modeling joke or provide a building tip. These guys want and need help and they are the voice of the club and the AMA for the local guys.
You get the idea I think. As leaders we all probably have some influence in our local areas and could help make things more enjoyable for the guys we have already signed up so that we close the door on attrition and let the recruiting efforts fill us back up.
Remind everyone that it is a hobby. We do it to have fun so let’s have fun! Q
Of those I've trained none had control reversal problems. They immediately moved the aileron stick in the correct direction.
This is why it takes so many hours, months/years to learn. The plane is flying too fast and not close to being a trainer.
Little to no communication. Just "you got it -- I got it".
All instructors tend to teach this way.
If the student fails to learn, or takes an extraordinary time to finally solo, the instructor blames the student.
The idea is that I could teach tech teachers how to use this teaching method within an hour or two, well enough to at least be able to give meaningful simulator instruction, even if the teacher had little or no previous model RC flight experience.
Imagine if every club and school had instructors able to literally instantly train their students to solo status. Results: mass and rapid growth. It is entirely possible.
Promotional RC Flight Instruction
A viable solution to the decline in
I know I can teach most anyone how to use my promotional RC flight instruction technique within a few hours.
Hobby shop owners, industry members and school tech teachers will all but be guaranteed to learn enough to at least be able to give hands-on (test drive) simulator instruction/demonstration to customers.
Membership growth is entirely in the hands of the altruistic we-teach- for-free club instructors.
No matter what program AMA initiates, or how much is spent, it means nothing because it's totally up to the club's (free) flight instruction system whether there is growth or not.
After all, as far as the club's instructor is concerned, he has no real incentive to spend his valuable field time to the chore of teaching newcomers. The industry wants tons more customers, but the same cannot be said of clubs and instructors.
I've been told by instructors that they don't mind teaching, but they will not go out of their way looking for trouble.
Meaning if someone shows up the one day a week most clubs offer instruction,
instructors will give flight instruction,
but they will not go out of their way to search for newcomers to teach.